Topic Choice free essay sample

Wrltlng an essay can be a daunting task for both teachers and students In terms of creating and crafting a high quality essay, and finally editing and grading them. It seems though we may have overlooked one of the toughest steps in writing an essay and that is actually selecting an appropriate and interesting topic for your students. Thankfully I have put together a list of 25 great essay topics that might Just make that process a little easier. Enjoy. And remember to add any other great suggestions in the comment section below. If you are still struggling with the essay riting process and need further guidance be sure to check out our essay guides here. 1. Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to a natural environment, Discuss some of the arguments for and/or against keeping animals In zoos. 2. Imagine that your teacher wants to teach a new subject for the next few weeks. We will write a custom essay sample on Topic Choice or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Your teacher will take suggestions, and then let the students vote on the new subject. What subject should your class choose? Write an essay to support your choice and to persuade the other students to vote for your choice. 3. Are actors and professional athletes paid too much? . Should teachers have to wear uniforms or have a dress code? 5. Since the invention of nuclear weapons we have had a long period of GLOBAL peace and stability. Are nuclear weapons global peacemakers or killing devices? 6. Should boys and girls be In separate classes? A year ago I noticed a pattern in the least successful startups wed funded: they all seemed hard to talk to. It felt as if there was some kind of wall between us. I could never quite tell if they understood what I was saying. This caught my attention because earlier wed noticed a pattern among the most uccessful startups, and it seemed to hinge on a different quality. We found the startups that did best were the ones with the sort of founders about whom wed say they can take care of themselves. The startups that do best are fire-and-forget In the sense that all you have to do is give them a lead, and theyll close it, whatever type of lead it is. When theyre raising money, for example, you can do the initial Intros knowing that if you wanted to you could stop thinking about it at that point. You wont have to babysit the round to make sure it happens. That type of founder Is oing to come back with the money: the only question is how much on what terms. It seemed odd that the outliers at the two ends of the spectrum could be detected by what appeared to be unrelated tests, Youd expect that If the founders at one end were distinguished by the presence of quality x, at the other end theyd be distinguished by lack of x. Was there some kind of inverse relation between resourcefulness and being hard to talk to? It turns out there Is, and the key to the mystery Is the old adage a word to the wise Is sufficient. Because this phrase is not only overused, but overused in an indirect way by prepending the subject to some advice), most people whoVe heard it dont know wnat It means. wnat It means Is tnat IT someone Is wlse, all you nave to ao Is say one word to them, and theyll understand immediately. You dont have to explain in detail; theyll chase down all the implications. In much the same way that all you have to do is give the right sort of founder a one line intro to a VC, and hell chase down the money. Thats the connection. Understanding all the implications†even the inconvenient implications†of what someone tells you is a subset of resourcefulness. Its conversational resourcefulness. Like real world resourcefulness, conversational resourcefulness often means doing things you dont want to. Chasing down all the implications of whats said to you can sometimes lead to uncomfortable conclusions. The best word to describe the failure to do so is probably denial, though that seems a bit too narrow. A better way to describe the situation would be to say that the unsuccessful founders had the sort of conservatism that comes from weakness. They traversed idea space as gingerly as a very old person traverses the physical world. [1] The unsuccessful founders werent stupid. Intellectually they were as capable as the successful founders of following all the implications of what one said to them. They just werent eager to. So being hard to talk to was not what was killing the unsuccessful startups. It was a sign of an underlying lack of resourcefulness. Thats what was killing them. As well as failing to chase down the implications of what was said to them, the unsuccessful founders would also fail to chase down funding, and users, and sources of new ideas. But the most immediate evidence I had that something was amiss was that I couldnt talk to them.